NORTH  4  J86  AKT3  Q9652  KQJ96  9543  54  K4    T8  KQ2  QJ76  AJT7    A7532  AT7  982  83

Dealer: East    Vul: Both   IMP Scoring West 1 2 3N North 2 Pass Pass East 1 Pass1 2N Pass South Pass Pass Pass Pass

1 Tends to deny 3 spades

South tried 2 instead of reopening opposite "declining to support double" partner (with a double).
East could have passed that double to eventually arrive at a two trick set (300).

What was the delayed 2N? Was 2 forcing? Wouldn't an East 2 bid have shown a minimum with exactly two spades?
If West could bid a non forcing 2, wouldn't East have possibly had a singleton spade precluding such as 18 points? Could it be a singleton spade and 15 to 17 points with clubs that had been forcing to pass? Would that instead bid 3N over 2?

At IMP scoring, vulnerable, West took no chances of missing game and tried 3N.
A club was led to East's J.
Spades were started, the 2nd round won by South.
A heart was played to North's J and East's K.
A club was played to dummy's K and three spades cashed, leaving declarer looking at:

	NORTH    954  54
AT  982			J8  AK  Q
	QJ7  AT

There were 4 spades, 2 clubs, 1 heart and