| |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|
West led the
T. Declarer took
stock.
Declarer's opening bid of a diamond envisioned a 2
rebid.
When North bid 1
, South, with
a stopper in spades and a probable combined stopper in hearts, decided to bid
1N instead, showing 2 hearts and a balanced 11 to 14 points.
The 2
alternative is a less precise
range of 11 to 17 and weakly suggests fewer than 2 spades.
What is your plan as declarer?
With at least 4 heart losers and a top diamond loser off the top, down 1 might
be an expected result.
If hearts block, perhaps 3N would make, very unlikely given the missing
9.
Also possible was a 5:2 heart division when 3N without blockage would be down
2.
Declarer won the first spade in dummy with the
K
and tried to sneak a diamond trick by leading toward the
K.
Leading the
Q instead might have
made communication with dummy easier, but would have made easier for an East
that MIGHT have had the
A to
win and start hearts.
West won the diamond and tried spades again, East quite possibly having held
such as
AJ9x(x).
South won in hand perforce the
A
and cashed 3 rounds of diamonds, hoping that a player with 4 clubs to the
T
might discard one based on the premise that South couldn't hold as many as 5
clubs for the 1
opener.
Club had divided anyway and declarer ended with 2 diamonds, 3 spades and 5 clubs.
How would your system of defence faired on this hand?