|
(or Bergen over NoTrump) |
DONT: Bidding 2
or 2
or 2
over their 1N opening shows
that suit and some higher ranking suit.
Double shows some single suited
hand.
How many systems do you have for your partner's 1N opening?
Do you play Blackwood, 4 Suit Transfers, Texas, Smolen, Weisburger, Fragments
and Minor Suit Stayman?
When the opponents interfere, most systems are OFF and you and your partner
might not be prepared.
The same stands for many other partnerships. Many don't have DONT
defences. Catch them unprepared!!!
Get ready to alert! Everything is alertable with this one.
Minimum distribution: 5-4
in the two suits when not vulnerable
and 5-5 when
vulnerable
Points? You need points? How about a minimum of 8 HCP (WITHOUT EXTRAORDINARY
distribution)?
|
RHO opens
|
My bid
|
Worst Case Scenarios:
|
|
|
Not Vulnerable
|
Vulnerable
|
||
|
1N
|
2
= clubs and some other suit |
3 AT84
J32 K9765 |
Add 1 card to the suit
|
|
2
= diamonds and a major |
Q654 K97
QJT85 J |
" "
|
|
|
2
= majors |
AJT86 QJ94 T2
T2 |
" "
|
|
|
2
= weak spades |
KQT876 K2
T43 T2 |
A longer suit or extra K
|
|
|
Double = some suit
|
|
A longer suit or extra K
|
|
Partner's Responses to my Two Suited Overcalls
| 1N | 2 |
Pass |
Pass - another suit might be worse (e.g. K9732 J9743
3 32)2 - no other suit is worse than your clubs (e.g.
KQJ2 JT943 32
32)2 - I have a good heart suit (at least KQTxxx)2 - I have a good spade suit (at least KQTxxx)
|
2 |
Pass - another suit might be
worse (e.g. K9732 3 32
J9743)2 - Neither major is worse than your diamonds (e.g.
KJT4 92 92
A8765)2 - I have a good spade suit (at least KQTxxx)
|
||
2 |
Pass - my spades aren't better than my hearts 2 - my spades are better than my hearts
|
Partner's Responses to my Single Suit Showing Double
|
1N
|
Double
|
Pass
|
Pass - 15+ HCP (e.g. |
!D.O.N.T. is alerted:
|
|
Here North-South have enough for game.
East's 2
bid interferes with
transfers and invitations.
South might normally have transferred to spades. Did you bid 3
?
That's not really much of a suit.
How about Stayman instead? Was 3
Stayman for you? The cuebid of a known enemy suit is Stayman here.
A Defence to the D.O.N.T. defence
| 1 N |
X
|
XX
- Relay to clubs, suggesting a minor 2 2 - transfer to hearts2 - transfer to spades2 - shows weak clubs (?) |
2![]() |
X - Stayman 2 - diamonds, to play2 - hearts, to play2 - spades, to play |
|
2 |
X - Penalty 2 - hearts, to play2 - spades, to play |
|
2 |
X - promises 8 or
9 HCP and at least 3 cards in either major 2 - shows both minors (at least 5-4)2 N is Lebensohl (usually a long weak suit) 3 of a minor is forcing 3 of a major is shortness with 10+ HCP |
2 |
|
Lots of play here!
The 3N contract couldn't be beat and 4
had good play.
Was 4N a sacrifice then?
You had a choice between 2
and 2
.
Which did you choose?
Reaching game playing D.O.N.T. (with a Forcing 2 N reply)
|
1N
|
2
|
Pass
|
2 N - Game interest. What do you have? |
|
Pass
|
3
3 3 3 |
X!
shows some singled suited hand (good vulnerable) |
|
That heart suit is good, but not good enough for East to bid.
Would your 2
, as North, still have been
Stayman?
Does Stayman promise just both majors here or points too?
Pass was a good alternative to Stayman.
If you play DONT, you give up the penalty double in order to show a
single suiter.
There is still a chance to penalize: partner might pass for penalties with 15+
HCP. You promised 8+ HCP.
Endnotes:
You can still increase the pre-empt with 3 or 4 level suit bids.
With a very strong hand and a long suit, you can double and maybe later bid
at the 3 level.
I prefer a lighter 5-4 not-vulnerable vs
vulnerable requirement at matchpoints.
"Partner, I owe you one." is one of my favourite sayings.
Unfortunately, so is "Sorry about that partner!"
Would you play D.O.N.T. in balancing seat?